Schedule a Consultation
216-480-4620Schedule a Consultation
216-480-4620
Aortic dissection is one of the most serious cardiovascular emergencies a person can experience. It is also increasingly survivable when recognized and treated promptly. The medical community's ability to treat this condition has advanced significantly over the past several decades. Survival depends heavily on how quickly the diagnosis is made and treatment is initiated.
The Becker Law Firm represents patients and families in Cleveland medical malpractice and wrongful death cases involving delayed diagnosis and failure to diagnose serious conditions. Call us at 216-480-4620 to discuss your situation.
An aortic dissection occurs when a tear develops in the inner layer of the aorta, the body's largest artery, allowing blood to flow between the layers of the aortic wall. This creates a false channel that can expand rapidly, compress branch arteries, reduce blood flow to vital organs, and in the worst cases rupture entirely. The condition progresses quickly and without prompt treatment, it is frequently fatal.
Aortic dissections are classified into two primary types. Type A dissections involve the ascending aorta and carry a higher risk of early mortality, typically requiring emergency open-heart surgery.
Type B dissections involve the descending aorta only and may in some cases be managed with medication and monitoring rather than immediate surgery, though many still require intervention. The distinction between types directly affects treatment strategy and survival outcomes.
The aorta carries the full output of the heart to the rest of the body. A dissection that goes unrecognized while a patient sits in a waiting room or is sent home with a misdiagnosis is an active, progressing emergency that rapidly narrows the window for life-saving treatment.
As the medical community understands the human body more and more, the survival rate of such tears has increased over time.
In high-volume centers, in-hospital survival rates for Type A dissection are often reported in the range of approximately 70% to 90%, reflecting significant advances in surgical and postoperative care. These numbers reflect decades of improvement in surgical techniques, anesthesia management, perfusion strategies, and postoperative intensive care. The condition that was once considered almost uniformly fatal is now survivable for many patients who receive timely, appropriate treatment.
Type B dissections managed with optimal medical therapy show similarly improved outcomes, with in-hospital survival rates often exceeding 85% to 90% in uncomplicated cases identified early.
Advances in cardiothoracic surgery over the past 30 years have significantly improved outcomes for aortic dissection patients. Improved bypass techniques, better myocardial protection during surgery, advances in aortic repair and replacement procedures, and more sophisticated postoperative monitoring have all contributed to lower mortality.
The development of endovascular repair options for certain Type B dissections has provided less invasive treatment pathways with strong outcomes for appropriate candidates.
Many patients who undergo successful treatment for Type A aortic dissection have meaningful long-term survival, but outcomes vary based on age, overall health, and complications
Ongoing care including regular monitoring and blood pressure control is essential, and some patients may need additional procedures. With proper management, many individuals are able to return to active, productive lives.
Type A aortic dissection is a medical emergency, and delays in diagnosis and surgery are associated with worse outcomes. Although older studies have commonly cited an untreated mortality rate of about 1% to 2% per hour early after symptom onset, newer registry data confirm that early mortality remains significant and that faster recognition can improve the chance of survival.
Aortic dissection presents with a constellation of symptoms that can be confused with other, less immediately dangerous conditions. The classic presentation is sudden, severe chest or back pain often described as tearing or ripping in quality. However, presentations vary significantly, and emergency physicians frequently encounter patients whose symptoms are attributed to heart attack, musculoskeletal pain, gastrointestinal issues, or other diagnoses that do not trigger the imaging needed to identify a dissection.
The absence of certain expected findings, such as a normal EKG or normal initial cardiac enzymes, sometimes falsely reassures providers and delays the consideration of aortic dissection as the correct diagnosis. This is a well-recognized pathway through which delays can occur.
Aortic dissection is frequently missed in emergency room settings. Overcrowding, triage errors, anchoring bias toward more common diagnoses, and failure to obtain appropriate imaging all contribute to delayed recognition. A patient presenting with severe chest pain who undergoes evaluation for myocardial infarction but is not assessed for aortic dissection when the clinical presentation warrants such evaluation may represent a deviation from the standard of care, depending on the specific clinical circumstances.
Not every missed diagnosis constitutes malpractice. But when a provider's failure to recognize and investigate aortic dissection falls below the accepted standard of care and that failure contributes to a patient's death or serious harm, it may give rise to a legal claim.
The diagnosis of aortic dissection requires imaging. CT angiography of the chest, MRI, or transesophageal echocardiography are the primary diagnostic tools, and the standard of care generally requires that this imaging be ordered when a patient's presentation is consistent with possible dissection.
Failure to order appropriate imaging when the clinical picture calls for it, or failure to interpret imaging findings correctly, is a common focus of failure to diagnose claims in these cases.
Sending a patient home with a diagnosis of musculoskeletal chest pain, gastroesophageal reflux, or anxiety when their symptom pattern should have prompted consideration of aortic dissection may be considered a deviation from accepted emergency medicine standards. When that error results in the patient returning hours later in extremis or dying before reaching care, the clinical and legal consequences are serious.
Cardiology malpractice cases involving aortic dissection frequently involve not a single dramatic error but a series of communication failures, triage oversights, and documentation gaps that collectively result in a delay that costs the patient their life. Identifying every point at which the standard of care was not met requires thorough expert medical review of the complete record.
Certain conditions significantly elevate the risk of aortic dissection. Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, bicuspid aortic valve, and other connective tissue disorders predispose patients to aortic wall vulnerability. A history of aortic aneurysm, prior cardiac surgery, or a family history of aortic disease also elevates risk. Providers treating patients with these known risk factors should maintain a higher index of suspicion for aortic dissection when chest or back pain presents.
Chronic hypertension is the most common risk factor for aortic dissection and tends to be present in the majority of affected patients. Atherosclerosis, cocaine use, and physical exertion are also associated with increased risk. The combination of uncontrolled hypertension and a presentation of sudden severe chest or back pain should prompt serious consideration of aortic pathology in any emergency evaluation.
When a delayed or missed diagnosis of aortic dissection results in a patient's death, surviving family members may have a wrongful death claim against the responsible providers and institutions. These cases require establishing that the standard of care required earlier recognition of the condition, that the failure to meet that standard caused the death, and that the death produced compensable losses for the surviving family.
The Becker Law Firm handles wrongful death cases arising from medical negligence throughout Ohio.
Establishing negligence in a missed aortic dissection case often requires expert medical testimony from qualified emergency medicine and cardiothoracic surgery professionals. These experts review the medical records and opine on whether the care provided met the applicable standard of care. In doing so, they closely examine the timeline of the patient's presentation, the symptoms documented, the diagnostic workup performed, and the clinical decisions made at each stage of care.
Cases where imaging was never ordered despite a high-risk presentation, or where the patient was discharged and later died, tend to present the clearest factual pictures of preventable failure.
Families coping with the loss of a loved one due to a misdiagnosed aortic dissection are often left grieving while trying to understand how the diagnosis was missed and whether the outcome could have been prevented. A Cleveland medical malpractice attorney can conduct the thorough investigation needed to help determine whether the care provided met the standard required, identify every responsible party, and pursue the full compensation the family is entitled to under Ohio law.
Aortic dissection is increasingly survivable when recognized and treated promptly. When a patient passes away from this condition, an important question is whether the outcome was unavoidable or whether earlier diagnosis and intervention could have changed the result. If you lost a family member to aortic dissection and believe the diagnosis was delayed or missed, The Becker Law Firm is ready to help you find answers.
Contact us at 216-480-4620 today to speak with a Cleveland medical malpractice lawyer about your situation.
